Tag Archive | "Real Estate"

Lower Pottsgrove Planners Scheduled To Meet Tonight

Lower Pottsgrove Planners Scheduled To Meet Tonight

Lower Pottsgrove's municipal building.

SANATOGA PA – Their Sept. 20 meeting ended without choosing a replacement to succeed the retiring chairman. Their Oct. 18 meeting was canceled altogether. Tonight (Monday, Nov. 15, 2010), members of the Lower Pottsgrove (PA) Township Planning Commission will try again to gather and act on its business, even if that involves only tying up organizational loose ends.

The board meeting is scheduled to begin at 6:30 p.m. in the municipal building, 2199 Buchert Rd., Pottstown PA, and is open to the public. As of 6 a.m.today a board agenda was not yet available from the township website. If an agenda is posted later, it usually can be downloaded here.

Probably topping the commission’s to-do list is selecting a chairman to follow Geoffrey Dailey, who retired at the end of September’s meeting after 23 years of service.

Posted in Lower Pottsgrove, Real EstateComments (1)

What They Sold For

What They Sold For

Thay paid how much?

POTTSTOWN PA – The top price paid for real estate within Lower Pottsgrove (PA) Township from April 26-July 9, 2010, was $325,000, the Philadelphia Inquirer newspaper reports. The property is located at 1645 Potter Dr.

This week’s top reported prices were listed Sunday (Oct. 24, 2010) in “The Top 50,” the newspaper’s weekly review of highest prices paid for real estate sold within the city of Philadelphia and townships in its surrounding counties.

During the same period, the top real estate sales price in Pottstown PA Borough, immediately to the west was $250,000; Limerick PA Township, east, $353,010; New Hanover PA Township, northeast, $315,000; Upper Pottsgrove PA Township, west, $186,000; and in North Coventry PA Township, south, none listed.

Across all of Montgomery County, the highest-priced property sold during the period went for $1,985,000, at 1132 Youngsford Rd., Lower Merion PA.

Related:

Photo from Clipart.com

Posted in Business, Lower PottsgroveComments (2)

20101020-LowerPottsgroveSign

Lower Pottsgrove Planning Board Cancels Meeting

SANATOGA PA – Monday night’s (Oct. 18, 2010) meeting of the Lower Pottsgrove (PA) Township Planning Commission was abruptly canceled, according to a message that appeared after 3 on Monday afternoon at the township website. No reason was offered for the postponement.

Planners are next scheduled to meet Nov. 15 (2010; Monday) at 6:30 p.m. in the municipal building, 2199 Buchert Rd., Pottstown PA.

Likely to top their agenda at that time is the selection of a chairman. Former Chairman Geoffrey Dailey officially retired from the position during the board’s September meeting without the remaining members choosing his successor.

Posted in Business, Lower PottsgroveComments Off

What They Sold For

What They Sold For

They paid how much?

They paid how much?

POTTSTOWN PA – The top price paid for real estate within Lower Pottsgrove (PA) Township from April 15-June 30, 2010, was $240,000, the Philadelphia Inquirer newspaper reports. The property is located at 41 Pebble Beach Ln.

This week’s top reported prices were listed Sunday (Oct. 17, 2010) in “The Top 50,” the newspaper’s weekly review of highest prices paid for real estate sold within the city of Philadelphia and townships in its surrounding counties.

During the same period, the top real estate sales price in Pottstown PA Borough, immediately to the west was $182,000; Limerick PA Township, east, $325,000; New Hanover PA Township, northeast, $385,100; Upper Pottsgrove PA Township, west, $170,000; and in North Coventry PA Township, south, $275,000.

Across all of Montgomery County, the highest-priced property sold during the period went for $4,660,000, at 251 Cheswold Ln., Lower Merion PA.

Related:

Posted in Business, Lower PottsgroveComments Off

What They Sold For

What They Sold For

They paid how much?

They paid how much?

POTTSTOWN PA – The top price paid for real estate within Lower Pottsgrove (PA) Township from April 8-June 24, 2010, was $205,000, the Philadelphia Inquirer newspaper reports. The property is located at 1352 Randy Dr.

Also listed was 673 Buchert Rd., at $182,900.

This week’s top reported prices were listed Sunday (Oct. 10, 2010) in “The Top 50,” the newspaper’s weekly review of highest prices paid for real estate sold within the city of Philadelphia and townships in its surrounding counties.

During the same period, the top real estate sales price in Pottstown PA Borough, immediately to the west was $147,500; Limerick PA Township, east, $415,000; New Hanover PA Township, northeast, $340,000; Upper Pottsgrove PA Township, west, $288,365; and in North Coventry PA Township, south, $382,000.

Across all of Montgomery County, the highest-priced property sold during the period went for $1,925,000, at 1862 Aloha Ln., Lower Merion PA.

Related:

Sign up to get The Sanatoga Post delivered free daily by e-mail. Share this article.
See our galleries for photos that appear in The Post. Got news for us? E-mail The Post.
Find The Posts on Twitter, Facebook, Linked-In, Technorati, Flickr, YouTube, and RSS

Posted in BusinessComments Off

What They Sold For

What They Sold For

They paid how much?

They paid how much?


POTTSTOWN PA – None of the real estate sales within Lower Pottsgrove (PA) Township from April 1-June 18, 2010, commanded a high-enough price to be listed Sunday (Oct. 3, 2010) among top-selling properties reported by the Philadelphia Inquirer newspaper. Real estate among the township’s municipal neighbors made the grade, though.

This week’s top reported prices were listed in “The Top 50,” the newspaper’s weekly review of highest prices paid for real estate sold within the city of Philadelphia and townships in its surrounding counties.

During the same period, the top real estate sales price in Pottstown PA Borough, immediately to the west was $182,000; Limerick PA Township, east, $360,000; New Hanover PA Township, northeast, $132,100; Upper Pottsgrove PA Township, west, $280,000; and in North Coventry PA Township, south, $146,000.

Across all of Montgomery County, the highest-priced property sold during the period went for $1,345,000, at 349 Old Gulph Rd., Lower Merion PA.

Related:

Sign up to get The Sanatoga Post delivered free daily by e-mail. Share this article.
See our galleries for photos that appear in The Post. Got news for us? E-mail The Post.
Find The Posts on Twitter, Facebook, Linked-In, Technorati, Flickr, YouTube, and RSS

Posted in BusinessComments Off

20100929-PottsgroveMiddle-Google

Pottsgrove MS Retaining Wall Needs ‘Significant’ Repair

The northeast retaining wall at Pottsgrove Middle School is streaked with white efflorescence, an indicator of moisture, in this November 2008 Post file photo.

POTTSTOWN PA – “Significant problems” with poor water drainage behind a retaining wall outside the cafeteria of the 11-year-old Pottsgrove Middle School, perched on a North Hanover Street ridge high above the Pottsgrove School District, will require the wall to be taken apart and rebuilt at a cost that’s “probably going to be painful,” the district Board of School Directors was told Tuesday (Sept. 28, 2010).

That assessment, offered by board treasurer and Facilities Committee Chairman Fred Remelius, follows committee discussions earlier in the night of a 20-page report, illustrated with color photographs, that documents the wall’s several structural failures and recommends fixes.

The white-topped, semi-circular retaining wall in front (right) of the Pottsgrove Middle School is seen in the top center portion of this Google photo. North Hanover Street is far right.

Ultimately, the report by a Lancaster PA engineering firm concludes, the retaining wall and its pilasters (columns) “have undergone significant water intrusion and subsequent deterioration.” There is no “feasible” way to dry the wall out and restore it, engineers noted, and it apparently is so far gone that it cannot be simply repaired and maintained.

District taxpayers likely will end up bearing the rebuilding cost, for which there was no immediately available estimate. “There’s no guarantee on a school building, and unfortunately these problems have surfaced more than 10 years down the road,” Remelius said.

The board took no action on the report. The wall’s structural problems seemingly pose no immediate danger to students occupying the building several feet behind it.

Problems with the retaining wall, which holds back earthen and other fill material in front of the school building, have been obvious for more than a year. The wall is buckling in some places, cracking in others, and is streaked with white efflorescence. The district hired structural engineers Baker, Ingram and Associates to review its condition during December (2009), and the firm returned in June (2010) for a more thorough inspection.

It determined that water over time has penetrated the wall, is even pooling behind it in some places, and has weakened its red-colored masonry veneer. Some of its steel components are rusting and flaking. Mortar joints are cracked, sealants are missing, and there are open joints around embedded railing posts topping the wall, the report said.

“The as-built construction of the retaining wall and pilaster is completely inadequate” to limit or release moisture or control water that gets into its components, according to the report. “There was probably a design defect to begin with,” Remelius acknowledged.

The report urges the district to address the problems soon. “If left unattended, these conditions will worsen and expand, resulting in more rapid deterioration, and the potential for partial collapse” of the veneer, the engineers warned.

Their report “does not address any other portion of the existing building structure,” they added.

Related (to the Pottsgrove Board of School Directors’ Sept. 28 meeting):

Sign up to get The Sanatoga Post delivered free daily by e-mail. Share this article.
See our galleries for photos that appear in The Post. Got news for us? E-mail The Post.
Find The Posts on Twitter, Facebook, Linked-In, Technorati, Flickr, YouTube, and RSS

Posted in BusinessComments (2)

20100929-Contractor-ClipartCom

Wha'daya Know? State Law Does What It Was Written For

HARRISBURG PA – A state law that so far this year has robbed Lower Pottsgrove (PA) Township coffers of about $15,000 in unrealized income actually seems to be doing what it’s supposed to: reducing the number of complaints about home improvement contractors working in Pennsylvania.

Complaints to the state regarding unfinished or shoddy projects done by unscrupulous contractors “have dipped considerably” this year, thanks to the Home Improvement Consumer Protection Act passed in 2009, the Harrisburg Patriot-News newspaper reported Monday (Sept. 27, 2010).

The law requires all contractors doing $5,000 or more per year in home improvements to register with the state Attorney General’s office at a cost of $50 bi-annually. It also demands that contractors use written contracts and give customers information about their right to cancel a contract, projects’ start-dates and end-dates, total cost, scope of work and materials involved. It limits up-front payments,too.

The law’s results have been dramatic. “In 2009 there were 3,057 complaints about contractors,” Patriot-News reporter Matthew Kemeny wrote — “the highest in three years, state records showed. This year, there have only been 1,402 complaints to date, according to the data.”

With more than 71,000 people registered, Kemeny added, the state also has made about $3.5 million from the legislation.

On the other hand, it’s taken a toll on revenues in municipalities like Lower Pottsgrove, which for years operated a township-wide contractor registration system. Finance Director Michele Christman told the Board of Commissioners in July (2010) that the township, which earned $21,000 from registrations during 2009, by this mid-year had brought in only $5,100.

That’s one of several issues commissioners must resolve as they continue to work on assembling the township’s 2011 budget. The board’s budget committee meetings, which are open to the public, are next scheduled for Oct. 5 and 20, both at 4:30 p.m. in the municipal building, 2199 Buchert Rd., Pottstown PA.

In the Harrisburg area, contractors cited by Kemeny praised the law as an effective tool in weeding out shoddy contractors. Others said they view it as just another tax on small businesses.

“Violations of any of the requirements can trigger a civil lawsuit by the Attorney General’s office, with fines and penalties of up to $1,000 per violation (up to $3,000 for violations involving a senior citizen). The state has filed charges against 27 contractors since the law was put in place,” the newspaper reported.

Related:

Photo from Clipart.com

Sign up to get The Sanatoga Post delivered free daily by e-mail. Share this article.
See our galleries for photos that appear in The Post. Got news for us? E-mail The Post.
Find The Posts on Twitter, Facebook, Linked-In, Technorati, Flickr, YouTube, and RSS

Posted in BusinessComments Off

What They Sold For

What They Sold For

They paid how much?

They paid how much?

POTTSTOWN PA – The top price paid for real estate within Lower Pottsgrove (PA) Township from March 29-June 14, 2010, was $137,900, the Philadelphia Inquirer newspaper reports. The property is located at 631 Oaktree Ct.

Also listed were 1306 Walnut Ridge Estates, at $130,000, and 2999 Linfield Rd., at $72,000.

This week’s top reported prices were listed Sunday (Sept. 26, 2010) in “The Top 50,” the newspaper’s weekly review of highest prices paid for real estate sold within the city of Philadelphia and townships in its surrounding counties.

By contrast, during the same period, the top real estate sales price in Pottstown PA Borough, immediately to the west was $190,000; Limerick PA Township, east, $183,990; New Hanover PA Township, northeast, $363,243; Upper Pottsgrove PA Township, west, none listed; and in North Coventry PA Township, south, $214,000.

Across all of Montgomery County, the highest-priced property sold during the period went for $1,540,000, at 1205 Meetinghouse Rd., Lower Gwynedd PA.

Related:

Sign up to get The Sanatoga Post delivered free daily by e-mail. Share this article.
See our galleries for photos that appear in The Post. Got news for us? E-mail The Post.
Find The Posts on Twitter, Facebook, Linked-In, Technorati, Flickr, YouTube, and RSS

Posted in BusinessComments Off

Company Cancels Zoning Hearing On Digital Sign

Company Cancels Zoning Hearing On Digital Sign

SANATOGA PA – A proposal to erect a digital sign in Lower Pottsgrove (PA) Township that would promote the products and services of Haines and Kibblehouse Inc. apparently has been put on hold.

The construction materials and contracting company based in Skippack PA, and with operations spread over several states, was scheduled to make a presentation Tuesday (Sept. 21, 2010) to the Lower Pottsgrove Zoning Hearing Board. It was seeking board approval to mount a two-sided digital display billboard on H&K property off South Sanatoga Road.

Instead, the township announced, the hearing request has been “continued to a later date,” which was not specified. No reason for the delay was offered.

Montgomery County property records indicate the parcel on which the sign would be located, No. 420001856001, is a 12.94-acre property purchased in 1980. Its accompanying map shows the property has extensive frontage along U.S. Route 422, where an existing Haines and Kibblehouse sign atop a hill is visible from the highway’s west- and east-bound lanes. The property is near H&K’s Pottstown-Sanatoga Trap Rock Quarry.

The company is headquartered at 2052 Lucon Rd., Skippack PA.

Related:

Photo from Clipart.com

Sign up to get The Sanatoga Post delivered free daily by e-mail. Share this article.
See our galleries for photos that appear in The Post. Got news for us? E-mail The Post.
Find The Posts on Twitter, Facebook, Linked-In, Technorati, Flickr, YouTube, and RSS

Posted in NewsComments Off

From Our Sponsors

From Our Sponsors